BIOL 123 Lab Manual

Lab 11. Ecology

Ecological & ​CONSERVATION POLICY in KY 

  • Home
    • About
    • Safety
    • Suggestions
  • Intro to Science
    • Lab 1 Doing Science
    • Lab 2 Analysis
    • Lab 3 Peer Review >
      • Lab 3 Fall
      • Lab 3 Spring
  • Evolution
    • Lab 4 Evidence
    • Lab 5 Phylogenies
    • Lab 6 Taxonomy
  • Biodiversity
    • Lab 7 Showcase
    • Lab 8 Bioindicators
    • Lab 9 Metrics
  • Ecology
    • Lab 10 Principles
    • Lab 11 Policy
    • Lab 12 Blitz (Sp Only)
  • Library

Lab 11. Pre-Lab

This lab is about arguing for your Conservation Priory Area in a semi-formal debate-style format. You'll begin by learning about the important role ecology can and should play in conservation and management decisions, as well as brief history of the environmental movement in the United States. Then, using all the data and research you have analyzed and collected in the past week, you will conference with your like-minded peers to create a cohesive argument for the Priority Area you believe deserves increase finding and attention. Following the debate you will reflect on your final opinions regarding management and conservation policy in Kentucky. 
  • Introduction
  • Do you know enough?
  • What will we do in lab?
  • LABridge
<
>

A history of ecology & conservation

"Insofar as ecology describes, classifies, hypothesizes, and tests hypotheses, it fits the classical mode of science as exemplified by physics and chemistry. However, because ecology extends to human interactions, including aesthetics, ethics, politics, and economics, it doesn’t fit that mold."
The above quote is from the "Brief Introduction to the History of Ecology" written by Edward J. Kormondy. Please read over the article in the sidebar. Our project involving Priority Conservation Areas is intended to highlight both sides of this ecological coin. You've been provided the data and your existing knowledge on the scientific method and hypothesis testing are valuable tools to help you answer our question in the classic model of pure science. However, to complete the circle, ecological science needs to inform policy to make an impact in terms of conservation.  
It's difficult to imagine that before the environmental movement of the 60s and 70s, environmental stewardship and conservation were not considered important components of planning, policy, or regulations. Two important events are often cited as triggers for a change in the way ecology can and should inform how we use our resources: Rachel Carson wrote Silent Spring, and the Cuyahoga River caught fire. The Wildlife Action Plan you learned about last week is a direct result of the environmental movement and environmental laws and policy. Best practice is for ecology to inform these resource decisions. You will participate in class debate on the potential for increased funding of one Tier I. Conservation Opportunity Areas. You'll explore the history of the environmental movement in the next tab. 
Picture
Click here for the article.
Picture
Be sure to read the article on the history of ecology.
Picture
Read over the two examples provided below.

Silent Spring
​by Rachel Carson, 1962

The Cuyahoga Burned 
Several times, the last in 1969

Picture
Ecological studies detailed in the book exposed DDT, an extremely popular pesticide, as the reason for the massive decline in the Bald Eagle population. DDT worked it's way up the food chain from insects to fish and caused a softening of eagle eggs, leading to massive nest-deaths across their range. Bald Eagles, our national bird, were facing extinction. The pesticide was banned and the book led to outrage which helped spark the environmental movement. Since then, Bald Eagle populations have recovered.
Picture
Heavily industrialization zones lined both sides of much of the Cuyahoga River as it traveled through Cleveland, OH. Most of the waste produced by these factories was emptied into the river and the water itself became flammable. River fires were not uncommon before laws and policies regulated what could and could not be dumped into our watersheds. Ecological studies track and trace these pollutants and led to some of our earliest and most important environmental legislation following these disturbing events.

A history of U.S. environmental laws 

To best understand how environmental policy is made, we first need to examine the history of such laws in the US. ​
The Most important Environmental Laws in the US: Summary of 7
  • 1963, Clean Air Act (CAA): regulates dangerous air pollutant emissions and authorizes the EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
  • 1970, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): ensures that federal projects (like new airports, highways, military bases, etc.) give proper consideration to the environment prior to the start of construction.
  • 1972, Clean Water Act (CWA): establishes the basic rules for discharging pollutants into waterways and regulating water quality standards.
  • 1972, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) is the Federal statute that governs the registration, distribution, sale, and use of pesticides in the United States.
  • 1973, Endangered Species Act (ESA): promotes the conservation of threatened and endangered plants and animals and their habitats. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Service also help administer this act.
  • 1990, Oil Pollution Act (OPA): issues rulings for aboveground oil storage facilities limits and requires responsible groups to submit plans detailing how they will respond to large oil spills.
  • 2005, Energy Policy Act: addresses energy (renewable energy, coal, gas, oil, etc.)  production and use in the U.S. For example, the Act provides loan guarantees for entities that avoid the production of greenhouse gases.
Picture
Watch the video on environmental legislation.
Picture
Review the summary list of seven key laws to know.
Picture
Review the steps of creating environmental laws.
Picture
Click here for the basic steps of creating new environmental laws or regulations.
Picture
More complete list of laws from the 60s and 70s (source: Lamphere, Jenna & Shefner, Jon. (2015). Situating the Green Economy: Discourses, Cooptation, and State Change. 10.1108/S0278-120420150000034005).

What will we do in lab?

The Wildlife Action Plan you learned about last week is a direct result of the environmental movement and environmental laws and policy. Best practice is for ecology to inform these resource decisions. In Lab 11, you will participate in class debate on the potential for increased funding of one Tier I. Conservation Opportunity Areas.
  1. Exercise I. Conference with colleagues and organize your evidence.
  2. Exercise II. Class debate.
  3. Exercise III. Vote and conclusions.
This figure shows the linkages between biodiversity, ecology, conservation, policy and human well-being. Read the whole article if you're interested.
Picture
Picture
Seddon N, Mace GM, Naeem S, Tobias JA, Pigot AL, Cavanagh R, Mouillot D, Vause J, Walpole M. 2016. Biodiversity in the Anthropocene: prospects and policy. Proc Biol Sci. 14;283(1844)
If you feel confident with this material, click the bridge icon below and navigate to Blackboard to take the LABridge for this week. Be ready to be tested on this material before you go to the quiz, and make sure you have your Lab Notebook Guide ready to submit as well.
Picture
Click here to get to WKU's blackboard to take your LABridge for this week.

Lab 11 Protocol.

Objectives. Following this lab you should be able to...
  • Describe the environmental movement, its causes, and a few major environmental laws.
  • Link the science of ecology with both conservation and environmental policy. 
  • Discuss the primary ecological factors that make an area valuable to conserve.
  • Use ecological evidence, reasoning, and critical thinking to propose why some areas deserve priority.
Overview. In today's lab you will participate in a class debate regarding Kentucky's Tier I. Conservation Priority Areas. 
  • Exercise I. Management Conference
  • Exercise II. Policy Debate
  • Exercise II. Final Vote & Opinions
  • Exercise I.
  • Exercise II.
  • Exercise III.
  • Exam Prep
<
>

EXERCISE I. CONFERENCE WITH YOUR COLLEAGUES

Procedure. Three lobbying groups will be formed in lab, one for each Tier I Conservation Area for which there is support. You will be given 30m to discuss the evidence you gathered and frame your argument for increased funding. Decide on a representative or representatives who will present your case to the class. Each lobbying group will have 5-10 minutes to make their argument and 5-10 more minutes to answer questions posed by the audience. At the end of the debate, each group will post the top 3 most persuasive reasons their area should receive more funding, and then the class will vote.
  1. Group up according to the assigned benches. You should sit with your peers who are supporting the same Tier I Conservation Area.
  2. Decide on a leader or leadership team.
  3. ​Discuss the key areas of support for your area.
  4. For each area of support, ensure your evidence and reasoning are clear as well as your source information.
  5. ​The debate will occur in three rounds: Presentation, rebuttal, and conclusions. You can review the procedure in Exercise. II. 
  6. ​Take notes and decide on your presentation format. Will one or two people speak for the whole group? Will you assign "experts" to address each point or argument? 
  7. Decide on someone (or a team) to take notes on the arguments put forth for the other areas so you address those points in your rebuttal. 
Picture
Appendix 4.26 - Overlapping Conservation Areas for Mussels, Fishes & Lampreys, Mammals, Birds, Reptiles & Amphibians
Don't be nervous about this. This is informal. You should stand when speaking, just to ensure you can be heard, but you do not need to be perfect. Just make a rational argument using evidence. 

Exercise iI. Class Debate

Procedure. The debate will be moderated by your TA and will follow the basic guidelines below: Estimated time = 35-40  minutes
  1. Presentation. You will have 5 minutes to present your case. You must use evidence from your research and be sure to cite your sources. 
  2. Rebuttal. There will be a 10-15 minute rebuttal period in which each group can address specific points made by others or ask specific questions. 
  3. Conclusions. Each group will be allotted 2 minutes to make their final case.
  4. Recording. Each group will list the 3 most important considerations in their argument on the board.
Picture

Exercise III. Vote for increased funding

Picture
Click here to vote.
Picture
Complete this week's Lab Notebook Guide.

Final Exam InfOrMation

Bring YOUR DEVICE (iPad, laptop, etc.).
  • Through RESPONDUS ONLY: It will be set up exactly like the syllabus quiz but will include a password.
  • Charge your laptop.
  • Update your laptop.
  • Update Respondus if needed.
  • Chromebooks WILL NOT work. Visit https://www.wku.edu/its/toppertech/ for a loaner device if needed and please review: https://www.wku.edu/ogden/tech_recs.php
  • Do you know your log-in information? Can you access the WKU-Secure wifi?
  • If you are late you will not be able to take the exam. Be on time guys!​
The Exam
  • During your regular lab day and time
  • The exam will have T/F, multiple-choice, matching questions, fill-in-the blank and essay questions
  • It will be in 2 parts: Practical & Standard
  • The focus will be on showing what you can DO, with a smaller amount of questions on what your KNOW
The biggest difference between a practical and a standard exam is that a practical exam will require you to show what you can do, not just what you know. Ask yourself these questions: Can you…
  • Use both a compound and dissection microscope?
  • ID all the parts and magnifications?
  • ID the taxa we have studied? Plants (including cones and flowers, Fungi (including mold types), and Protists
  • ID their important parts for movement, consumption, or reproduction?
  • ID the parts of both types of microscope and ID the magnification as set?
  • Use and create a dichotomous key?
  • Build a phylogenetic tree from a matrix?
  • List and use the steps of the scientific method?
  • Complete a chi-square analysis?
  • Measure the cephalic index of a skull?
  • ID common concepts associated with evolution?
  • ID peer-reviewed scientific articles form others?
  • Use the geological timeline to date labeled fossils?
  • Calculate common diversity indicators?
  • ID dependent and independent variables
  • Analyze t-test results?
  • Analyze chi-square results
The practical section will be entirely fill-in-the-blank. The standard part of the exam will be multiple choice, T/F, matching, short answer, and essay. The above list is not all inclusive but gives you a basic idea of what to expect! ​

Faculty Spotlight: Albert Meier & the WKU Green River Preserve

Picture
Dr. Albert Meier, now faculty emeritus in the Department of Biology, is a true naturalists and conservationist. Dr. Meier is a University Distinguished Professor who has dedicated his life educating young ecologists and preserving the biodiversity of our region. He has won countless awards, and appointments for his research and his service. Dr. Meier's work has been cited more than 1,300 times. He was fundamental in the development, acquisition, and management of our very own biological preserve, adjacent to Mammoth Cave National Park, in the Green River COA.
The Green River Preserve (GRP) comprises over 1600 acres of land across the banks of the Green River in Hart County, Kentucky. The mission  is to foster knowledge and protection of this highly diverse region and our natural heritage through research, education, and conservation.  A large spring known as McCoy Blue Hole is located on the tract north of the river and an endangered cave shrimp have been recorded there. Two federally endangered bat species inhabit caves on the  property, which serves as swarming habitat. The Preserve also provides critical breeding and migratory habitat for neotropical songbirds along the Green River corridor.
View his Goggle Scholar Page
​
Learn More about the GRP
Written and collated by Natalie Mountjoy & Steve Huskey
This website is intended solely for use of BIOL 123 students at Western Kentucky University. Usage for any other persons is expressly prohibited. The information here is copyrighted (all rights reserved ©), cited, or within "Fair Use" under the scholarship or education exemption (section 107 of the Copyright Act).
BIOL 123 Online Lab Manual © 2022 by Natalie Mountjoy is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 
  • Home
    • About
    • Safety
    • Suggestions
  • Intro to Science
    • Lab 1 Doing Science
    • Lab 2 Analysis
    • Lab 3 Peer Review >
      • Lab 3 Fall
      • Lab 3 Spring
  • Evolution
    • Lab 4 Evidence
    • Lab 5 Phylogenies
    • Lab 6 Taxonomy
  • Biodiversity
    • Lab 7 Showcase
    • Lab 8 Bioindicators
    • Lab 9 Metrics
  • Ecology
    • Lab 10 Principles
    • Lab 11 Policy
    • Lab 12 Blitz (Sp Only)
  • Library